Le lien vers la FAQ du nouveau site de JK Rowling a été posté sur le sujet
Harry Potter mais je me permets de le remettre vu que ça répond à quelques questions
->
http://www.jkrowling.com/welcome-to-my-new-website/ (FAQ en bas)
Notamment la 6, sur pourquoi Newt est venu en bateau et pas en portoloin, et pourquoi il a pas utilisé l'accio sur le Niffleur (ou le cafard)
Par contre il l'a utilisé à la fin de l'épisode de la bijouterie (si je me souviens bien) donc j'imagine qu'il visait les bijoux à l'intérieur du Niffleur que le Niffleur en lui-même ._.
1.
Why couldn’t Newt just Apparate to the USA? Why did he go by boat?
Apparition becomes increasingly risky over long distances. As with most magic, much depends on the skill of the spell-caster: Apparition requires knowledge of the terrain to which one is moving, or the ability to visualise it clearly. Cross-continental Apparition would almost certainly result in severe injury or death.
Moreover, the beasts in Newt’s case had varying magical natures. Some could have Apparated with him, but others could not.
2.
Why did Newt go in through No-Maj customs?
He was transporting magical creatures at a time when this was illegal. No-Majs were far easier to fool than the wizarding checkpoint would have been.
3.
Why couldn’t Newt use ‘Accio’ to retrieve all his beasts?
‘Accio’ only works on inanimate objects. While people or creatures may be indirectly moved by ‘Accio-ing’ objects that they are wearing or holding, this carries all kinds of risks because of the likelihood of injury to the person or beast attached to an object travelling at close to the speed of light.
